Freaky Fast Food Facts

February 5, 2008

There’s a big fight going on now between the restaurant industry and public health officials about whether or not the caloric content of foods should be listed on menus. Of course, restaurants are reluctant to do this.

One of the best arguments that I’ve seen for doing this can be found in a little item in BusinessWeek (February 11, 2008). In an article on this very topic, the magazine featured a picture of a Quiznos Tuna Melt sandwich (12 inches long, 1.3 lb.). Guess how many calories? A whopping 2,090!!!! Although I am not a proponent of calorie counting, 2,090 calories is an absolutely ridiculous amount of calories for something that is 1) just a sandwich and 2) just one meal in an entire day. If the restaurant industry insists on tempting Americans with huge quantities of cheap, caloric-excessive food, I think that they should have to put that information where it is easy to read. I am sure that they would find a decreased demand for their large tuna melt at Quiznos. Here’s the link to the article: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_06/b4070036764931.htm?chan=search

If this information were to appear on menus, what would Americans do? For one thing, I bet more people would buy donuts than muffins at Dunkin’ Donuts and feel virtuous for doing so. In the March issue of Consumer Reports, there is a delightful little quiz about which of two items has fewer calories and less fat. It turns out that a Dunkin’ Donuts French Cruller has 180 calories and 13 grams of fat while a Dunkin’ Donuts corn muffin has 510 calories and 18 grams of fat! In another person favorite, a Ruby Tuesday Triple Prime Burger has 883 calories and 56 grams of fat while the Ruby Tuesday Parmesan Shrimp Pasta has 1,221 calories and 64 grams of fat. And did you know that 3 Big Macs have fewer calories and less fat than one individual Uno deep-dish Schroom pizza? How is that possible? It makes you wonder about what, exactly, is in that Schroom pizza.

I’m not advocating any of these choices, but I do think it would interesting to see what Americans would do if the caloric information were readily available to them. Perhaps restaurants would discover that there was more of an appetite out there for healthy choices and reasonable portions than they imagined.

Entry Filed under: Food Facts. Tags: .

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. doreen  |  February 5, 2008 at 10:53 pm

    I probably would have shrugged at first with regards to giving nutritional information on restaurant menus, but then again, most of the restaurants I eat at tend to be small mom-and-pop affairs. Sure, they *may* have something akin to the Schroom pizza, but I don’t think I’m ordering it.

    For people who are watching their weight, or for those who ought to, it doesn’t hurt to be more informed about what one is eating, especially when a deceptively healthy item turns out to be rather unhealthy, like Dunkin’ Donuts’ muffins vs doughnuts. I’m reminded of the salads at fast food restaurants that start out like a good idea… until someone adds some heavy dressing, which negates the good food choice completely.

    Thanks for the article! I’d like to link to it from my blog, if I may.

  • 2. Food Sense article « Tasty Fever!  |  February 5, 2008 at 11:01 pm

    [...] 5 02 2008 I came across another WordPress blog with an interesting article entitled Freaky Fast Food Facts, and I’d like to recommend it to anyone who eats fast food on a big or little scale, as well [...]

  • 3. Diane Carlyle  |  February 6, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    Hi Doreen -

    Please feel free to link. Glad you enjoyed it! You make a good point about mom-and-pop restaurants, and that’s where the issue gets really murky. At least for me. On the other hand, I feel that fast food chains are really just one step above processed food you might buy in a grocery store — only it is freshly (sometimes) prepared and served by people. And if Amy’s frozen dinners has to share their nutritional facts, shouldn’t McDonalds? Mom & Pops spaghetti diner is another story, though.

  • 4. Lou Clark  |  February 12, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    Hi Diane –
    I am so pleased to see a blog that is not only informative but also provides a very unbiased view.
    I look forward to reading your next posts…

    Lou

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

Recent Posts

Feeds

Archives